ࡱ> M bjbj== %WWmeel2224f(    8|@L N"(j"E#_() N N N N N N N$AO aQt0N *E#E#**0NGF4j"ENGGG*  j" j" NG* NG~GKM  Nj" @)~ p8M N[N0NM,QI?Q NG    Remote Behavioral Influence Technology Evidence John J. McMurtrey, M. S., Copyright 2003, 12 August 2003 People who perceive remote manipulation by described technology have formed protest organizations across the world.    Educated society is uninformed regarding authentic documentation of the development and existence of such technologies, and unaware of the dangers. Complaint of hearing voices and perception of other remote manipulation, must receive appropriate scientific and legal investigation with protection. Ignorance among professionals is virtually complete with eminent texts and opinion demonstrably presumptions regarding complaints of some victims. Herein is substantiated: Human wireless internal voice transmission and tracking technologies. Reports of electroencephalographic (EEG) thought reading capacity, evidence of covert development, and remote EEG capture technology. References to the use of these or similar technologies against humans. MICROWAVE HEARING Allan H. Frey was the first American  to publish on the microwave hearing effect in 1962, yet radar technicians had anecdotes of microwave perception in World War II. Deaf and normal subjects, even with earplugs, can hear appropriately pulsed microwaves at least up to thousands of feet from the transmitter. Control by the subject of the radiofrequency to drive the acoustic amplifier produced sound most similar to normal. However high frequency sound is relatively lacking. Transmitter parameters above the effect produce a severe buffeting of the head with dizziness and nausea, while parameters below the effect induce a pins and needles sensation. Peak power is the major determinant of loudness, though this had some dependence on pulse width. Pulse modulation appears to influence pitch and timbre. The effect is the most easily and reliably replicated of low power density (microwave) illumination.  Review of animal microwave hearing confirmation by independent investigators establishes validity.    Discovery of recieverless and wireless voice transmission at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research is by Sharp and Grove, while working for the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Their method was simple: the negative deflections of voiceprints from recorded spoken numbers were caused to trigger microwave pulses. Upon illumination by such verbally modulated energy, the words were understood remotely. That the discoverys applications are obviously not limited to therapeutic medicine was apparent to James C. Lin in Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications. A Defense Intelligence Agency review of Communist literature affirmed microwave sound and indicated voice transmission. States the report: Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at very low average power densities.  Among microwave weapon implications are great potential for development into a system for disorientating or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic personnel. Assessment by the Army Mobility Equipment Research and Development Command affirms microwave speech transmission with applications of camouflage, decoy, and deception operations.  One decoy and deception concept presently being considered is to remotely create noise in the heads of personnel by exposing them to low power, pulsed microwaves . . . By proper choice of pulse characteristics, intelligible speech may be created quotes the report. The Brunkan Patent # 4877027 Hearing system is a device capable of verbal microwave hearing.  The invention converts speech for remote introduction into the head by parabolic antenna with direct neural influence, and nerve dead deaf efficacy. The microwave spectrum granted is broad: 100-10,000 MHz (0.1-10 GHz.) Pulse characteristics are essential to perception. Bursts of narrowly grouped, evenly spaced pulses determine sound intensity by their amount per unit time. Although a wide spectrum is claimed by the patent with ranges of pulse and burst duration, preferred operation has burst duration at 2 microseconds, and pulse duration at 100 nanoseconds. Operation is at 1000 MHz, which is the frequency of optimal tissue penetration. Another patent application based on microwave bursts is designed in such a way that the burst frequencies are at least virtually equal to the sound frequencies of the sounds picked up by the microphone, though the transducer here is unremote. Stocklin Patent # 4858612 Hearing device 7 affirms the microwave hearing effect with remedy of auditory nerve and cortex deafness. Stocklin gives exposition to the concept that a microwave component is part of neurophysiology and electroencephalogram (EEG) potentials. Microwaves are considered both emitted and absorbed by nerve cell membrane proteins. Microwaves generally excite the brain perhaps by influencing calcium, which is central for nerve firing. The auditory cortex normally produces microwave energy, which the device simulates, thus eliciting sound sensation. Each acoustic tone is weighted for several microwave frequencies by a formula called the mode matrix, which is used to calculate best perception requirements. Observation of EEG desynchronization, delta waves, and brain wave amplitudes helps calibrate the device to an individual. The lowest frequency for hearing is estimated by the cephalic index. Microwave speech transmission is here unremote with the antenna over and sized for the auditory cortex. Other patents have non-remote transducers of radiowave elicited hearing.   Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect. titles a small business contract for the Department of Defense. Communication initial results are: The feasibility of the concept has been established using both low and high power systems. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request as to the projects outcome met with denial on the part of the Air Force, on the grounds that disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause damage to national security.  Though the FOIA disclosure was denied, such an awards purpose is elaborated in the Air Forces New World Vistas report: It would also appear possible to create high fidelity speech in the human body, raising the possibility of covert suggestion and psychological direction . . . . If a pulse stream is used, it should be possible to create an internal acoustic field in the 5-15 kilohertz range, which is audible. Thus it may be possible to talk to selected adversaries in a fashion that would be most disturbing to them.  The above Army efforts had results. A microwave voice transmission non-lethal weapon is referenced in the thesaurus of the Center for Army Lessons Learned, which is a military instruction website. Neuro-electromagnetic designation is compatible with Stocklins mechanism. The military thesaurus entry lists similar devices using silent sound.   ULTRASOUND TRANSMISSION OF VOICE Internal voice capability is also evident in ultrasound-based technology without nearby discernment. Lowrey Patent # 6052336 Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier clearly focuses on non-lethal weapon application against crowds or as directed at an individual. Communication is understood as an inner voice with loss of the directional quality of sound perception. The following quote appears as an effect on people: Since most cultures attribute inner voices either as a sign of madness, or as messages from spirits or demons, both of which . . . evoke powerful emotional reactions. Replaying speech, with a delay impedes talking and causes stuttering. Nearly or below audible sound (infrasound) causes unease, increases suggestibility, with nausea and malaise from higher intensity. More power produces organ damage. Normal brain wave patterns can be changed (or entrained), which may cause temporary incapacitation, intense feelings of discomfort. This technique is detailed by Monroe Patent # 5356368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of consciousness, with license to Interstate Industries and involves an auditory replication of brainwave patterns to entrain the EEG as desired. Norris Patent # 5889870 Acoustic heterodyne device and method, directionally produces sound on interference (or heterodyning) of two ultrasound beams. This process becomes apparent particularly within cavities such as the ear canal. Communication is readily understood by an individual across a noisy crowed room without nearby discernment. Sound can also be produced from mid-air or as reflecting from any surface. Noted is nausea and disorientation on ultrasound localization of low frequency noxious vicinity. American Technology Corporation licensed the patent, has an acoustic non-lethal weapons technology, a development agreement with the Army, with the military being the fastest growing part of their business, and lists non-lethal weapons significantly in their annual report. A popular magazine writer describes the devices sound perception inner nature. From separate references, non-lethal weapons treatments affirm sound localization and individual ultrasound effect limitation with obvious lack of nearby discernment; the latter by a non-lethal weapons program director. Both the ultrasound patents are based on ultrasound cancellation by interference leaving the carried audible sound perceivable. Other acoustic influence methods may utilize ultrasound.  TARGET TRACKING TECHNOLOGY These Internal voice capable energy forms penetrate obstruction and can be localized. Commonly experienced is sound transmission through enclosures. An inaudible ultrasound high intensity carrier wave is unnoticed. Solid defect inspection is one use of ultrasound, which is being developed to discern movement through walls. Common technology utilizes the microwave hearing spectrum, which contains partially or wholly cell phone,  TV, and radar frequencies.  Commercial signals are unperceived, since the hearing effect requires specific pulsation limits. A variety of antennas localize this structurally penetrating illumination with collimation or focusing.  A patent, compatible for mobile platforms with DEWs, (Directed Energy Weapons) includes a modified Luneburg lens emitting parallel rays with over 50 years utilization. Hablov Patent # 5448501 Electronic life detection system is microwave radar within the hearing spectrum that, through obstruction, not only finds, but also differentiates individuals.  Therein is stated: the modulated component of the reflected microwave signal . . . subjected to frequency analysis . . . forms a type of electronic fingerprint of the living being with characteristic features, which . . . permits a distinction between different living beings. Though this patent has use in trapped victim rescue, another Hablov et. al. Patent # 5530429 Electronic surveillance system detects interlopers with security emphasis. The Hablov et. al. patents discern people thru structures apparently by vital organ motion, but others offer full imaging. Fullerton et. al. Patent # 6400307 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array is such a design. More within structure imaging designs are: a portable system determining suspect distance, and International Society for Optical Engineering presentations.  The acquisition, locking onto, and tracking of human targets is described by Rowan Patent # 4893815 Interactive transector device commercial and military grade. Stated therein: Potentially dangerous individuals can be efficiently subdued, apprehended and appropriately detained. The capability of isolating suspected terrorists from their hostages . . . or individuals within a group without affecting other members of the group is stated. Laser, radar, infrared, and acoustic sensor fusion is utilized to identify, seek, and locate targets. Locking illumination upon the target until weapons engagement accomplishes tracking. Among available non-lethal weapons is an incapacitating electromagnetic painful pulse. The British Ministry of Defense Logistics Organization lists a Man-Portable Surveillance & Target Acquisition Radar with ability to track men. A track initiation processor acquires a target, while a data association filter maintains a tracking lock on the target. An original method for target tracking is the Kalman filter. Numerous weapons guidance examples utilize similar processes and illuminate targets for tracking. Laser illumination is also for other targets than humans. Other examples utilize microwave beam target recognition and weapons guidance.  Target illumination tracking systems have nanosecond to microsecond response times. Such responses require no wide scan area to lock illumination upon persons at achievable speeds. At 90 miles per hour an auto travels less than 1/100 of an inch in a microsecond. Internal voice illumination device construction has long been feasible to competent engineering efforts that would produce many existing complaints THOUGHT READING CAPACITY Many people who have complaint of remote behavioral influence also perceive mind reading capacity. Thought reading capacity, or brain wave analysis word recognition is seriously reported. Publications by a Stanford group support recognition of words from brain waves,     with recent enhanced success. Other investigators publish above chance magnetoencephalographic (MEG) word recognition. EEG instant detection in syllables of a content of category which the testee whishes to speak quotes Kiyuna et. al. Patent # 5785653 System and method for predicting internal condition of live body.  A stated use: the present invention may be use (sic) to detect the internal condition of surveillance in criminal investigation. NEC Corporation licensed this patent. Remote EEG communication with Armed Forces or clandestine application is the cited use for Mardirossian Patent # 6011991 Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity.  Technology Patents, LLC licensed the patent, which proposes transmitter capable skin implants, and utilizes neural networks (artificial intelligence.) Publications unreferenced by current papers are a US technical report of prior results from Stanford comparable to the recent articles, dated 1975, and an apparent Russian report before 1981. The direction of robots by detecting mental states such as imagining raising the directionally appropriate arm or spinning cubes is reported.   Emotion differentiation by EEG is also patented, referencing Air Force research. Theoretical framework for EEG word recognition reports based on the activation of brain cell assemblies is elaborated for extensive publications of averaged EEG word category differentiation, also consistent with word recognition. EEG differentiation of words rated as to affective meaning such as good-bad, strong-weak, or active-passive is reported.  Based on EEG/MEG responses, words are readily distinguished from non-words,   or pictures, can be differentiated as to length,  and visual nouns can be differentiated from action verbs.     Brain wave patterns distinguish proper names from common nouns,  animal names from numerals, or content from function words.    Concrete versus abstract words, and unambiguous versus ambiguous noun/verbs have distinctive EEG patterns. Face, arm, or leg action verbs are reported distinguished by brain waves as well.  The research arm of agencies with missions to covertly acquire information would certainly complete any technologic thought reading potential. Assertions that such development has progressed are multiple, and two are confirmed by the 1975 report, which itself is evidence of development covert to open databases. An International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium synopsis states EEG computer mind reading development by Lawrence Pinneo in 1974 at Stanford. A letter by the Department of Defense Assistant General Counsel for Manpower, Health, and Public Affairs, Robert L. Gilliat in 1976 affirmed brain wave reading by the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Thought reading or synthetic telepathy communications technology procurement is considered in a 1993 Janes Special Operations Forces (SOF) article: One day, SOF commandos may be capable of communicating through thought processes. Descriptive terms are mental weaponry and psychic warfare  Although contemplated in future context, unlikely is complete development solely for Special Forces, and availability of a technology not fully adapted to troop level Special Forces requirements is implied. In 1976 the Malech Patent # 3951134 Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves was granted. Given operation example is 100 and 210 MHz; frequencies penetrating obstruction. Remote delineations are: The individual components of the system for monitoring and controlling brain wave activity may be of conventional type commonly employed in radar; and The system permits medical diagnosis of patients, inaccessible to physicians, from remote stations. License is to Dorne & Margolin Inc., but now protection is expired with public domain. The Malech patent utilizes interference of 210 and 100 MHz frequencies resulting in a 110 MHz return signal, which is demodulated to give EEG waveform. The capability of remote EEG is predicted by electromagnetic scattering theory using ultrashort pulses. Ultrashort pulses are currently defined in the range of 10-12 to 10-15 second. Considering that EEG word elicited potentials are comparatively long (100s of milliseconds), has relevance to remote radar EEG capture adequate to word recognition, with ultrashort pulses allowing some 109 or more radar reflections in a millisecond (10-3 sec.) The possibility of impressing an experience set on an individual by ultrashort pulses is also contemplated.104 The above patent alters brain waves, and microwave non-lethal weapon brain wave disruption and behavioral change including unconsciousness are known. The above EEG telemetry patent and ultrashort pulse method are by active radar probe. Yet a passive field extends as far as 12 feet from man as detected by a cryogenic antenna. A publication maintains this device as entirely adaptable to clandestine applications, and pointedly comments on the disappearance of physiological remote sensing literature since the 1970s for animals and humans, while all other categories of remote sensing research greatly expanded. Complete rejection of assertions of a remote mind reading capability is just as arrogantly presumptuous, in the face of complaints, as has been the dismissal of internal voice capacity. LEGAL AND INTERNATIONAL REFERENCES TO BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCE TECHNOLOGIES References to behavioral influence weapon use by government bodies and international organizations are numerous. Negotiation submissions to the United Nations Committee on Disarmament affirm the reality of infrasound (directed by ultrasound) and microwave weapon nervous system effects. European Parliament passage of resolutions calling for conventions regulating non-lethal weapons and the banning of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings  includes neuro-influence capability. A resolution relates to HAARP, High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project, which has environmental consequences, and although utilizing high frequency, ionospheric extra low frequencies (ELF) emanation results. Since ELF is within brain wave frequencies the project has capacity to influence whole populations Development of such capacity was predicted by President Carters National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski. Nature News reports concern by a French government panel about the potential for thought reading and such a remote capacity. An American draft law prohibiting land, sea, or space-based weapons using electromagnetic, psychotronic, (behavioral influence) and sound technologies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control has not yet passed. Russian electromagnetic standards are nearly 1000 times lower than the American, so their weapon law forbidding electromagnetic weapons exceeding Health Department parameters is strict. The Russian draft law explicitly references behavioral influence non-lethal weapons, their capabilities, and development in several countries. Resolutions by the International Union of Radio Science recognize criminal use of electromagnetic technology, though largely relevant to use against infrastructure. MICROWAVE AND ULTRASOUND USE AGAINST HUMANS The American Embassy in Moscow microwave irradiation received little publicity until the winter 1976 protective screening instillation, but irradiation was known since 1953. Original frequencies were 2.56-4.1 GHz with additional intermittent 0.6-9.5 GHz signals being permanent by 1975 in a wide band frequency hopping consistent pattern with one signal pulsating. The irradiation was directional from nearby buildings and modulated. Soviet complaint had no avail, but the signals disappeared in January 1979 reportedly as a result of a fire in one or more of the buildings.  A 9-11 GHz signal recurred in 1988. Observed frequencies are basically within the microwave hearing spectrum, and pulsation is required. Psychiatric cases occurred during the exposure period, though no epidemiologic relationship was revealed with fully a quarter of the medical records unavailable.121 The CIA had Dr. Milton Zaret review medical Soviet microwave literature to determine the irradiation purpose. He concluded the Russians believed the beam would modify the behavior of the personnel.  In 1976 the post was declared unhealthful and pay raised 20%.101 The most documented citizen microwave irradiation was of peace protesters at Greenham Common American Air Force Base in Berkshire England who prompted unusual symptom investigation. Radiation measurements exhibited microwaves with symptom experience up to a hundred times the background level, and rose sharply on protests nearer the base.122 Symptoms became pronounced on cruise missile transport, a protest focus.122 Recorded were wide ranging complaints: skin burns; severe headaches; drowsiness; temporary paralysis; incoordinated speech; two late (5 mos.) spontaneous abortions; an apparent circulatory failure; and unlike usual menstrual synchronization, irregular or postmenopausal menstruation. The symptom complex fits well with electromagnetic exposure syndrome.122 It has also been reported that some of the women heard voices. The base closed finally in 1991. Criminal directed energy weapon use has report in Germany. In a number of cases there is similarity of circumstances, complaints, and symptoms. In at least one case microwave fields have been measured with exclusion of the usual sources (cell phone towers, etc.) Plans for construction of a crude device from a microwave oven are sold.126 Ultrasound behavioral influence technology use in Northern Ireland is described. The device could focus on one person; utilized ultrasound cancellation like those patented, was employed in Vietnam by the Americans, and is known as the squawk box. Mentioned infrasound frequency (ultrasound carrier directed) is like Loos 1/25/00 patent, with psychological effects summarized as spooky. More detail is: When the two frequencies mix in the human ear they become intolerable. Some people exposed to the device are said to feel giddy or nauseous and in extreme cases they faint. Most people are intensely annoyed by the device and have a compelling wish to be somewhere else.  British police inventories list the specific device, though a spokesman denied use.122 Sophisticated behavioral influence capability is confirmed by ex-intelligence officers. Julianne McKinney, Director of The National Security Alumni Electronic Surveillance Project is prominent. This is a largely classified employee victim study with internal voice transmission avowal. The logic in the prediction by Brzezinski of the appearance of a more controlled and directed society dominated by a power elite willing to use the latest modern techniques for influencing behavior unhindered by liberal democratic values is compelling.114 Potential behavioral influence targets are multiple. Since those supposedly expert regard a victims perceptions as psychotic, all complaints are disregarded, not to mention capability to bear witness. Targets may include anyone worth neutralization: persons witnessing serious improprieties; security risks, which may only comprise classified disclosures; those prone to committing advantageous felonies; and domestic adversaries. Internal voice technology is most applicable within the same language and culture. Space here limits more than mentions of remote EEG influence capacity or footnote to remote subliminal technique. Subliminal message presentation represents a particularly insidious means of influencing thought, mood, behavior, and undermining civil liberties. Most complainants allege government element involvement or contractors thereof among certain private companies. Remote behavioral influence research has long been funded by the US, with evidence of development14 17 28 37 and weapons,38 39 31 36 42 though denying on national security grounds project results29 and foreign literature analyses. Some 30 countries evidence active behavioral influence weapon research. Though there has been some scant correct psychoanalytical acknowledgement, current medical awareness ensures effective neutralization of the afflicted. Not all those affected are stigmatized. However phenomena of hearing voices, perception of remote manipulation, or mind reading, when recounted to health professionals results in various diagnoses dependent on disability,   totally without investigation. Mandatory is determination of relevant fields around complainants, or abatement by proven shielding of such phenomena. Professional opinions formed without excluding these technologies are negligent. The longstanding and either identical or similar complaint to that here delineated as known technologic capacity by numerous victims indicts the presumption and deficient scholarship evident in the pertinent medical literature. In addition, microwave bioeffects have considerable congruence with reported major psychosis symptoms fully unrelated to voices. All of society should be disturbed at the prospect of technologic induction of voice since the unaware subject would perceive such voices as his own natural thought. Some may refuse complete scientific establishment in respect to mind reading capability, yet it is difficult to deny the level of substantiation for the possibility that such a remote thought reading capability exists. The logic that in the 30 years since the Pinneo work started, this capability has had full development is too sound to dismiss victim corroboration. Educated democracies should not be complacent at this prospect, given the potential for political control, and existence of a remote EEG method in the public domain. Acknowledgements: Thanks are given to God for inspiration, a benefactor of Christians Against Mental Slavery for financial support, and to Dr. Paul Canner his suggestions. All patents are printable from the U. S. Patent Office website. EEG word recognition articles are printable thru Pubmed or as designated. Each is free REFERENCES  Address: 903 N. Calvert St., Baltimore MD 21202. Email-  HYPERLINK "mailto:Johnmcmurt@aol.com" Johnmcmurt@aol.com Phone- 410-539-5140.  A financial contribution to this article was by fellow members of Christians Against Mental Slavery.  Soviet and East European electromagnetic bioeffect literature is prior, more extensive, and transparent. A translated Russian treatment is the following reference, which refers to F. Cazzamalli, an Italian, who mentioned radiofrequency hallucination about 1920.  Also called S-quad, Silent Sounds, Inc. licensed Lowery Patent #5159703 Silent subliminal presentation system, and has advanced brain wave entrainment technology (vide infra) with several classified patents. (See  HYPERLINK "http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htm" http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htm and links.) Unessential is individual direction, but possible by ultrasound.  Loos Patent # 6017302 Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous system can cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation.  Janes is the most respected and authoritative of defense reporting services.  A means evading detection.  National Security Advisor to President Carter. PAGE  PAGE 14  Citizens Against Human Rights Abuse, Director, Cheryl Welsh, 915 Zaragoza Street, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Website at  HYPERLINK "http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/" http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/  Christians Against Mental Slavery, Secretary, John Allman, 98 High Street, Knaresbourough, N. Yorks HG5 0HN, United Kingdom.  Moscow Committee for the Ecology of Dwellings, Chairman, Emile Sergeevne Chirkovoi, Korpus 1006, Kvrtira 363, Moscow Zelenograd, Russia 103575, Russia.  International Movement for the Ban of Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technologic Means, Founder, Mojmir Babacek, P. O. Box 52, 51101 Turnov, Czech Republic, Europe. Website at  HYPERLINK "http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm" http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htm  Presman AS. Electromagnetic Fields and Life Plenum, New York-London, 1970. Presman mentions Cazzimalli and another English reference to this Italian work is at  HYPERLINK "http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.html" http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.html p 2., a semi-popular treatment with references.  Frey AH, Human Auditory System response to modulated electromagnetic energy J Applied Physiol 17 (4): 689-92, 1962. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm" http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm  Stocklin PL. Patent #4858612 Hearing device USPTO granted 8/22/89.  Frey AH and Messenger R. Human Perception of Illumination with Pulsed Ultrahigh-Frequency Electromagnetic Energy Science 181: 356-8, 1973.  Eichert ES and Frey AH. Human Auditory System Response to Lower Power Density Pulse Modulated Electromagnetic Energy: A Search for Mechanisms J Microwave Power 11(2): 141, 1976.  Michaelson SM. Sensation and Perception of Microwave Energy In: Michaelson SM, Miller MW, Magin R, and Carstensen EL (eds.) Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Nonionizing Radiation Plenum Press New York, p 213-24, 1975.  Puranen L and Jokela K. Radiation Hazards Assessment of Pulsed Microwave Radars J Microwave Power Electromagn Energy 31(3): 165-77, 1996.  Hermann DM and Hossman K-A. Neurological effects of microwave exposure related to mobile communication J Neurol Sci 152: 1-14, 1997.  Lai H. Neurological Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation In: Lin JC (ed.) Advances in Electromagnetic Fields in Living Systems vol 1, Plenum, N Y & London, p 27-80, 1994.  Justesen DR. Microwaves and Behavior Am Psychologist, 392(Mar): 391-401, 1975. Excerpted reference at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm" http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm  Lin JC. Microwave Auditory Effects and Applications Thomas, Springfield Ill, p 176, 1978.  Surveillance Technology, 1976: policy and implications, an analysis and compendium of materials: a staff report of the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee of the Judiciary. United States Senate, Ninety-fourth Congress, second session, p 1280, US GOV DOC Y 4.J 882:SU 7/6/976.  Oskar KJ. Effects of low power microwaves on the local cerebral blood flow of conscious rats Army Mobility Equipment Command Report,. # AD-A090426, 1980. Available form NASA Technical Reports. Abstract at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm" http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm  Brunkan WB. Patent #4877027 Hearing system USPTO granted 10/31/89.  Frey AH. Behavioral Biophysics Psychol Bull 63(5): 322-37, 1965.  Thijs VMJ. Application #WO1992NL0000216 Hearing Aid Based on Microwaves World Intellectual Property Organization Filed 1992-11-26, Published 1993-06-10. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1" http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1 , but not at US Patent Office.  Stocklin PL. and Stocklin BF. Possible Microwave Mechanisms of the Mammalian Nervous System T-I-T J Life Sci 9: 29-51, 1979.  Beason RC and Semm P. Responses of neurons to an amplitude modulated microwave stimulus Neurosci Lett 333: 175-78, 2002.  Adey WR. Biological Effects of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields On the Central Nervous System NATO Advanced Study Institute on Advances in Biological Effects and Dosimetry of Low Energy Electromagnetic Fields Erice Italy, Plenum, p 359-391, 1981.  Shepherd GM. Neurobiology 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, New York-Oxford, p146-7, 1988.  Bise W. Low power radio-frequency and microwave effects on human electroencephalogram and behavior Physiol Chem Phys 10(5): 387-98, 1978.  Puharich HK and Lawrence JL. Patent #3629521Hearing systems USPTO granted 12/21/71.  Flanagan GP. Patent #3393279 Nervous System Excitation Device USPTO granted 7/16/68.  Kohn B. Communicating Via the Microwave Auditory Effect Defense Department Awarded SBIR Contract # F41624-95-C9007, 1993. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html" http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.html &  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm" http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm  Margo P. Cherney Freedom of Information Act Memorandum  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg" http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg  Castelli CJ. Questions Linger about Health Effects of DODs Non-Lethal Ray Inside the Navy 14(12): 1-6, 2001.  HYPERLINK "http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm" http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm &  HYPERLINK "http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.html" http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.html Center for Army Lessons Learned Thesaurus at  HYPERLINK "http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm" http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm  Lowery OM. Patent #5159703 Silent subliminal presentation system USPTO granted 10/27/92.  Lowrey A. Patent #6052336 Apparatus and method of broadcasting audible sound using ultrasonic sound as a carrier USPTO granted 4/18/00.  Monroe RA. Patent #5356368 Method of and apparatus for inducing desired states of conscisousness USPTO granted 10/18/94.  Norris EG. Patent #5889870 Acoustic Heterodyne device and method USPTO granted 3/20/99.  American Technology Corporation Announces Acoustic Non-Lethal Acoustical Weapon Technology for Military and Law Enforcement, press release of 10/30/01.  American Technology Corporation Announces Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with US Army, press release of 1/25/02.  American Technology Corporation Announces Expansion of Military Business at  HYPERLINK "http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.html" http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.html  American Technology Corporation Annual Summary to Shareholders Press Release of 4/23/03 at  HYPERLINK "http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.html" http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.html  Sparrow D. Best of Whats New Grand Award Winner: Hypersonic Sound Popular Science Dec p 94, 2002. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html" http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html  Bunker RJ (ed.) Less-then-lethal Weapons: Reference Guidebook Los Angles Calif {National Law Enforcemnt and Corrections Technology, Western Region], 2000. Similar treatmen is Bunker RJ (ed.) Nonlethal Weapons Terms and References INSS Occasional Paper 15, USAF Institute for National Security Studies, USAF Academy, Colorodo at  HYPERLINK "http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdf" http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdf  Alexander JB. Future War: Non-Lethal Weapons in Twenty-First-Century Warfare, St. Martins Press, New York, p. 101, 1999.  Loos HG. Patent #6017302 Subliminal acoustic manipulation of nervous systems USPTO granted 1/25/00. Hunt A, Tillery C, and Wild N. Through-the-Wall Surveillance Technologies Corrections Today 63(4): 132-3, 2001. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf" http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf  Frey AH. Headaches from Cellular Telephones: Are They Real and What Are the Implications Environ. Health Perspect. 106(3): 101-3, 1998.  Lin JC, Cellular Telephones and Their Effect on the Human Brain Mob Comput and Comm Review, 3(3): 34-5, July, 1999. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htm" http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htm  Nolan PJ, Fundaments of College Physics Wm. C. Brown: Dubuque, Iowa, Melbourne, Australia, Oxford England, p 716, 1993.  Reits BJ. Patent #5736966 Adjustable microwave antenna USPTO granted 4/7/98.  Maier G and Harrison D. Patent #5825554 Lenses with a variable refraction index USPTO granted 10/20/98.  Jasper LJ. Patent #6407708 Microwave generator/radiator using photoconductive switching and dielectric lense USPTO granted 6/18/02.  Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5448501 Electronic life detection system USPTO granted 9/5/95.  Hablov DV, Fisun OI, Lupichev LN, Osipov VV, Schestiperov VA, and Schimko R. Patent #5530429 Electronic surveillance system USPTO granted 6/25/96.  Fullerton LW and Richards JI. Patent #6400307 System and method for intrusion detection using a time domain radar array USPTO granted 6/4/02.  Nacci P. Radar-Based Through-the-Wall Surveillance System National Law Enforcement and Corrections Center at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm" http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm  Ferris DD, Microwave and millimeter-wave systems for wall penetration SPIE Proceedings 3375: 269-79, 1998.  Frazier LM, Surveillance through walls and other opaque materials SPIE Proceedings 2497: 115-19, 1995.  Rowan L. Patent #4893815 Interactive transector device commercial and military grade USPTO granted 1/16/90.  Ministry of Defence, Defence Logistics Organisation (British) at  HYPERLINK "http://www.mod.uk/dlo/ipts/es_land/sta_spss.htm" http://www.mod.uk/dlo/ipts/es_land/sta_spss.htm  Brookner E. Tracking and Kalman Filtering Made Easy Wiley, New York, 1998.  Tisdale GE and Lindemann HB. Patent #4497065 Target recognition system enhanced by active signature measurements USPTO granted 1/29/85.  Peralta EA and Reitz KM. Patent #4562439 Imaging radar seeker USPTO granted 12/31/85.  Ahlstrom LGW. Patent #4796834 Method for combating of targets and projectile or missile for carrying out the method USPTO granted 1/10/89.  Suppes P, Lu Z, and Han B. Brain wave recognition of words Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 14965-69, 1997. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965" http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965  Suppes P, Han B, and Lu Z. Brain-wave recognition of sentences Proc Natl Acad Sci 95: 15861-66, 1998. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861" http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861  Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu Z. Invariance of brain-wave representations of simple visual images and their names Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 14658-63, 1999. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658" http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658  Suppes P, Han B, Epelboim J, and Lu ZL. Invariance between subjects of brain wave representations of language Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(22): 12953-8, 1999. Printable free online thru PubMed or at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953" http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953  Suppes P and Han B. Brain-wave representation of words by superposition of a few sine waves Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 8738-43, 2000. Printable free online thru Pubmed or at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738" http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738  Assadullahi R and Pulvermuller F. Neural Network Classification of Word Evoked Neuromagnetic Brain Activity In: Wermter S, Austin J, and Willahaw D (eds.) Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence: Emergent Neurocomputational Architechures Based on Neuroscience Heidelberg Springer, p 311-20, 2001. More limited preliminary communication at  HYPERLINK "http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.doc" http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.doc  Kiyuna T, Tanigawa T, and Yamazaki T. Patent #5785653 System and method for predicting internal condition of live body USPTO granted 7/28/98.  Mardirossian A. Patent #6011991 Communication system and method including brain wave analysis and/or use of brain activity USPTO granted 1/4/00.  Pinneo LR and Hall DJ. Feasibility Study for Design of a Biocybernetic Communication System Report #ADA017405 National Technical Information Service, 1975. Prepared for the Advanced Research Projects Agency Order #2034, Program Code #2D20, Contractor: Stanford Research Institute Contract dates: 2/9/72-8/31/76, SRI Project LSU-1936. (US cost ~$50.)  Selden G. Machines That Read Minds Sci Digest Oct 89: 60-6, 1981. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.html" http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.html  Millan JR. Adaptive Brain Interfaces Communications of the ACM 46(3): 74-80, 2003. Abstract at  HYPERLINK "http://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.html" http://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.html  Millan JR and Mourifio J. Asynchronous BCI and Local Neural Classifiers: An Overview of the Adaptive Brain Interfact Project IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (Brain-Computer Interface Technology) 11(2): 159-61, 2003. Article also at  HYPERLINK "ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf" ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf  Millan JR, Renkens F, Mourifio J, and Gerstner W. Non-Invasive Brain-Actuated Control of a Mobile Robot Proceedings of the 18th Joint International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Aug 9-15, in press, 2003. Article also at  HYPERLINK "ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdf" ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdf  Patton RE. Patent #6292688 Method and apparatus for analyzing neurological response to emotion-inducing stimuli USPTO granted 9/18/01.  Pulvermuller F. Words in the brains language Behav Brain Sci 22: 253-336, 1999.  Skrandies W. Evoked potential correlates of semantic meaningA brain mapping study Cog Brain Res 6: 175-183, 1998.  Skrandies W and Chiu MJ. Dimensions of affective meaning behavioral evoked potential correlates in Chinese subjects Neurosci Lett 341: 45-8, 2003.  Krause CM, Korpilahti P, Porn B, Joskim J, and Lang HA. Automatic auditory word perception as measured by 40 Hz EEG responses Encephal Clin Neurophysiol 107: 84-7, 1998.  Diesch E, Biermann S, and Luce T. The magnetic mismatch field elicited by words and phonological non-words Neuroreport 9(3): 455-60, 1998.  Lutzenberger W, Pulvermuller F, and Birbaumer N. Words and pseudowords elicit distinct patterns of 30-Hz EEG responses Neurosci Lett 176: 115-18, 1994.  Kiefer M. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials diring picture and word categorization Mem Cog 29(1): 100-16, 2001.  Assadollahi R and Pulvermuller F. Neuromagnetic evidence for early access to cognitive represtentations Cog Neurosci Neurophysiol 12(2): 207-13, 2001.  Preissl H, Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. Evoked potentials distinguish between nouns and verbs Neurosci Lett 197: 81-3, 1995.  Pulvermuller F, Mohn B, and Schleichert H. Semantic or lexico-syntactic factors: what determines word-class specific activity in the human brain? Neurosci Lett 275: 81-4, 1999.  Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Preissl H. Nouns and Verbs in the Intact Brain: Evidence from Event-retlated Potentials and High-frequency Cortical Responses Cerebral Cortex 9(5): 497-506, 1999.  Pulvermuller F, Preissl H, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. Brain Rhythms of Language: Nouns Versus Verbs Eur J Neurosci 8: 917-41, 1996.  Kellenbach ML, Wijers AA, Hovius M, Mulder J, and Mulder G. Neural Differentiation of Lexico-Syntactic Categories or Semantic Features? Event-Related Potential Evidence for Both J Cog Neurosci 14(4): 561-77, 2002.  Muller HM and Kutas M. Whats in a name? Electrophysiological differences between spoken nouns, proper names and ones own name Neuroreport 8: 221-5, 1996.  Dehaene S. Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing Neuroreport 6: 2153-7, 1995.  Neville HJ, Mills D, and Lawson DS. Fractionating Language: Different Neural Subsystems with Different Sensitive Periods Cerebral Cortex 2: 244-58, 1992.  Pulvermuller F, Lutzenberger W, and Birbaumer N. Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 94: 357-70, 1995.  Mohr B, Pulvermuller F, and Zaidel E. Lexical Decision After Left, Right, and Bilateral Presentation of Function Words, Content Words, and Non-Words: Evidence For Interhemispheric Interaction Neuropsychologia 32(1): 105-24, 1994.  Munte TF, Wieringa BM, Weyerts H, Szentkuti A, Matzke M, and Johannes S. Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects Neuropsychologia 39: 91-102, 2001.  Kounios J and Holcomb PJ. Concreteness Effects in Semantic Processing: ERP Evidence Supporting Dual-Coding Theory J Exp Psychol 20(4): 804-23, 1994.  Federmeier KD, Segal JB, Lombrozo T, and Kutas M. Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context Brain 123(12): 2552-66, 2000.  Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neruophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing Brain Lang 78: 143-68, 2001.  Pulvermuller F, Harle M, and Hummel F. Neurophysiological distinction of verb categories Cog Neurosci 11(12): 2789-93, 2000.  HYPERLINK "http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html"  Guyatt DG. Some Aspects of Anti-Personel Electromagnetic Weapons International Committee of the Red Cross Symposium: The Medical Profession and the Effects of Weapons, ICRC publicationref.06681996 (The paper is available from the Health Division of the ICRC.) Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html" http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html   Brodeur, P. The Zapping of America Norton, New York, p 299 & 105 1977.  Lopez R. Special operations survives Pentagon budget constraints Janes International Defense Review 26(3): 247-51, 1993.  Malech RG. Patent #3951134 Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves USPTO granted 4/20/76.  Department of the Army, USAF Scientific Advisory Board. New World Vistas: air and space for the 21st century 14 vol. (Ancillary Volume) p 89-90, 1996. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.html" http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.html  Morehouse DA. Nonlethal Weapons: War without Death Praeger, p 20, 1996.  Dando M. A New Form of Warfare: The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons Brasseys, London, Washington, p 22, 1996  Becker RO. Cross Currents Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc., Los Angeles, p 303-4, 1990.  Taff BE and Stoller KP. Patent #49400558 Cryogenic ermote sensing physiograph USPTO granted 7/10/90.  Stoller KP and Taff BE. Remote Physiological Sensing: Historical Perspective, Theories and Preliminary Developments Med Instrum 20(5): 260-5, 1986.  Soviet Union Draft Agreement on the Prohibition of the Development and Manufacture of New Types of Weapons of Mass Destruction and New Systems of Such Weapons. UN Committee on Disarmament, CCD/511/Rev.1, Aug 1977. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htm" http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htm  European Parliament, 28.1.99 Enviroment, security, and foreign affairs , A4-0005/99 EP1159, resolutions 23, 24, & 27, January 28, 1999 . Limited excerpts at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm" http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm  Wright S. Future Sub-lethal, Incapacitating & Paralysing TechnologiesTheir Coming Role in the Mass Production of Torture, Cruel, Inhumane & Degrading Treatment. Presented to The Expert Seminar On Security Equipment & The Prevention of Torture 25-26 October 2002 London, UK and The 16th ISODARCO Winter Course On "The Surge in Non-State Violence: Roots Impacts & Countermeasures" 9 - 16 February, 2003, Andalo, Trento, Italy. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf" http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf &  HYPERLINK "http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.html" http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.html  Begich N and Manning J. Angels Dont Play This HAARP: Advances in Telsa Technology Earthpulse Press, Anchorage Alaska, p 176-8, 1995.  Brzezinski Z. Between Two Ages: Americas Role in the Technetronic Era Viking Press, New York, p 57 & 252, 1970.  Butler D. Advances in neuroscience may threaten human rights Nature 22 January 391: 316, 1998. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://raven1.net/nature1.htm" http://raven1.net/nature1.htm  Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 2977 IH, 107th Congress 1st Session Introduced by Hon. Dennis J. Kucinich. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm" http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htm  Federal Law About Weapons Federal Laws of the Russian Federation from 21.07.98 [1998] No. 117-F3, from 31.07.98 [98] No. 156-F3 , from 17.12.98 [98] No. 187-F3, from 19.11.99 [99] No. 194-F3, from 10.04.2000 [00] No. 52-F3, from 26.07.01 [01] ISBN 5-86894-393-7 Translation at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm" http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm  Gurov AI. Federal AssemblyParliament of the Russian Assembly, Govermental Duma, Committee on Safety, Resolution: Regarding the draft of the Federal Law About the Sumission of addendum to Article 6 of the Federal Law About Weapons No 28/3 Nov. 30, 2000. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm" http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm  General Assembly. International Union of Radio Science USRI Resolution on Criminal Activities Using Electromagnetic Tools In: Records of the USRI General Assembly, Toronto, 25: 178-9, 1999. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm" http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm  Steneck NH. The Microwave Debate MIT Press Cambridge, Mass, London Eng, 1984.  Microwave irradiation of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow: review of its history and studies to determine whether or not related health defects were experienced by employees assigned in the period 1953-1977. United States, Congress, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. US GOV. DOC. Y 4.C 73/7: IR 7.  Smith CW and Best S. Electromagnetic Man J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd., London p 211, 233, & 235, 1989.  Schiefelbein S. The Invisible Threat: The Stifled Story of Electric Waves Saturday Review Sept. 15: 16-20, p 17, 1979.  Parry G. Doctors investigating claims of Greenham radiation cases: Peace women fear electronic zapping at base (Manchester) Guardian, Mar. 10: 3, 1986.  Ramsay R. ELF: from Mind Control to Mind Wars Lobster 19: 23, 1990.  Munzert R. High-Tech Waffe Mikrowelle - Kriminelle Anwendungen von Mikrowellen Aufklrungsarbeit, Heft 9, April, S. 25-31, 2003. English treatment Targeting of the Human with Directed Energy Weapons is at  HYPERLINK "http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.doc" http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.doc  Munzert R. personal communication.  Lewer N and Schofield S. Non-Lethal Weapons: A Fatal Attraction? : Military Strategies and Technologies for 21st-Century Conflict Zed Books, London & New Jersey, p 62, 1997.  Rodwell, R. defense correspondent report Army tests new riot weapon New Scientist Sept. 20, p 684, 1973.  McKinney J. Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation Unclassified, June-July1992 4(3): 1-20. Also at  HYPERLINK "http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html" http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html For shorter statement--  HYPERLINK "http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.html" http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.html  McKinney J. Letter to President Clinton at  HYPERLINK "http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htm" http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htm  Becker RO and Selden G. The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life Quill William Morrow, New York, p 320, 1985.  Cheryl Welsh Freedom of Information Act request reply for review of Soviet literature, March 19, 1997 at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif" http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif  Lopatin VN, and Tsygankov VD. Psychotronic War and the Security of Russia Moscow, 1999. See research abroad section in translation at  HYPERLINK "http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm" http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm  Smith C. On the Need for New Criteria of Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Light of Mind Invasive Technology J Psycho-Social Studies 2(2) #3, 2003. Article at  HYPERLINK "http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html" http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html  American Psychiatric Association DSM-IV Task Force. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV-TRTM) American Psychiatric Association, 2000.  Flaum M and Schultz SK. The Core Symptoms of Schizophrenia Ann Med 28(6): 525-31, 1996.  Isselbacher, KJ, Adams RD, Brunwald E, Petersdorf RG, and Wilson JD. Harrisons Principles of Internal Medicine Ninth Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, p 150, 1980.  McMurtrey JJ. Microwave Bioeffect Congruence with Schizophrenia Virtually prepared article to follow, 2003. 01IJjklJK( ) <=>xyTUV  jk@A:;<=>34&' $0J>*H* j0JU j0JUj0J5U\5\CJ V01lmn A?*$ a$$a$$^a$$ & Fa$$a$$a$$a$qv w$)))) -/F147788A>A`F>IJ LNNNN $ !a$$`a$$a$$a$$`a$$$>%?%'':';'''''((i(j((((())))+++++++++p,q,r,s,-----,/-///0000@1A1B1C11144)5*555X6Y6Z6[6%9&9'9(9)9*9+9,9-9.999t:u:;;;)=*=V=W========H* j0JU0J j0JU]==>>>@>A>>>??????????@@*@+@,@f@g@h@i@j@k@l@m@n@o@p@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@AAEAFAAAAACCYDZDDDEEFFIIIIIIJJJJJJlKoKKKKKL LLLMMPPPPP j0JU0JH* j0JU]PP#R$RRRSS@TATTTUU6V7VWWWWXXXXYYZZZZ[[H\K\\\]^D^E^^^r_s___``qbrbbbccddddnhohhhhhhh5i7iXiYiiiii k!k"k#k$kJlKlxmymqqqqqqjU jU0JH* j0JU j0JUXN:V;VgVhVZi^_bcgil!n9p:ppp(qrqqqqrrsu$`a$$`a$$a$$a$qqrrrrrrssftgttttttuuRvSvvvvvvvvvvvvwwwww w wwwwwwwwwwYxZxxxyyzzz@zAzCzDzQzpzzz{{{E{F{x{y{jbU>*jUjU j0JU0JmHnHu0J j0JUjU j0JU0J jUGuRvvvvvvvvw w w wwYxxCzx{I||}}~DPh]h&`#$y{{{%|&|'|E|F|I|J|||} }}}U~~~~DE*^'()KLPQZׂ؂ۃ܃݃KL89vwxȅɅJKdžȆ+ÇƇLJՇH*0JjjUjiUjhU>* j0JU0JjwU jUOׂKȅJdžƇ]ɊZaJǎ$Dّޒxi]^./0lmpqŊƊɊʊ345WXZ[΋ϋ[\ab)*+^_abJKǎȎ$%DEѐҐjUj|Uj{Uj Uj Uj U0Jj U jU j0JUHҐӐ ef֑בّڑJKےܒޒߒ,-efgxy234deijwxcd !@AؚٚjkۛܛjUjUjU>*j3UjU j0JU0J jUNic @ؚj0~3 fD~qͪɫܛ ./01~0134Ah fgŠƠǠ͡ΡϡТѢABDE IJK{|~-.kljQUjUjUjUjmU>*j8U j0JU0J jUj;UHlm?:;<noqrKLʪ˪ͪΪ12ƫǫɫʫ٬ڬ !"Z[]^ޭFGɮʮ̮ͮWX#$jk>?ٳj%UH*j$Uj#Uj!Uj U>* j0JU0J jUMɫ]̮W#j>ٳn#|VfQ&h1ٳڳno#$|}VWfgQR&'456cdefghiw12QR0Jj)U jUH*>*0JCJj(CJU0JCJ0JCJCJjS'CJU0JCJj0JCJU j0JUE1^E/E:U )S3^_ky#$fgWXY&^#$%ۻj>/Uj.UaJ0JaJj,UaJ jUaJaJj+U0Jj*U jU>* j0JUF%BCEF ,-/0MN|}~BCEFSg:;UVqr %z|>*H*j[4Uj3U>*j%2Uj,1Uj+0UH* j0JU jU0JL|)*:;()*PQSTmDEqrs PQRtuwxbcd')*TU!>*H*jQ;UjP:Uj_9UjN8Uj6U0Jj5U jU j0JU>*ISwTQ$a$ !QR j0JU# 01h/ =!"#$%DyK Johnmcmurt@aol.comyK 4mailto:Johnmcmurt@aol.com!DyK +http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htmyK Vhttp://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htmDyK #http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/yK Fhttp://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/qDyK ?http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htmyK ~http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htmDyK (http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.htmlyK Phttp://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.htmlDyK http://www.raven1.net/frey.htmyK >http://www.raven1.net/frey.htmDyK #http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htmyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htmDyK #http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htmyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm5DyK 0http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1yK `http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1iDyK =http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.htmlyK zhttp://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.htmlDyK #http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htmyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htmDyK #http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpgyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpgqDyK ?http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htmyK ~http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htmDyK #http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.htmlyK Fhttp://www.pjproject.org/usaf.htmlEDyK 4http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htmyK hhttp://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm9DyK 1http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.htmlyK bhttp://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.html9DyK 1http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.htmlyK bhttp://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.htmlyDyK Ahttp://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.htmlyK http://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.html!DyK +http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdfyK Vhttp://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdf9DyK 1http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdfyK bhttp://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdf5DyK 0http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htmyK `http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htmDyK "http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htmyK Dhttp://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm5DyK 0http://www.mod.uk/dlo/ipts/es_land/sta_spss.htmyK `http://www.mod.uk/dlo/ipts/es_land/sta_spss.htm9DyK 1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965yK bhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/149659DyK 1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861yK bhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/158619DyK 1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658yK bhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/146589DyK 1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953yK bhttp://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/129535DyK 0http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738yK `http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738ADyK 3http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.docyK fhttp://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.docUDyK 8http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.htmlyK phttp://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.htmlDyK Chttp://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.htmlyK http://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.htmlYDyK 9ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdfyK rftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf]DyK :ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdfyK tftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdf-DyK .http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.htmlyK \http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html-DyK .http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.htmlyK \http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.htmlDyK #http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.htmlyK Fhttp://www.pjproject.org/usaf.htmlDyK (http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htmyK Phttp://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htmDyK "http://www.raven1.net/europar.htmyK Dhttp://www.raven1.net/europar.htmEDyK 4http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdfyK hhttp://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdf9DyK 1http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.htmlyK bhttp://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.htmlDyK http://raven1.net/nature1.htmyK <http://raven1.net/nature1.htmDyK #http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htmyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/govptron.htmDyK !http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htmyK Bhttp://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htmDyK !http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htmyK Bhttp://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm=DyK 2http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htmyK dhttp://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm9DyK 1http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.docyK bhttp://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.docQDyK 7http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.htmlyK nhttp://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.htmliDyK =http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.htmlyK zhttp://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.htmlDyK 'http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htmyK Nhttp://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htmDyK http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gifyK >http://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gifDyK #http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htmyK Fhttp://www.raven1.net/russtran.htmeDyK <http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.htmlyK xhttp://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html i8@8 NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH FA@F Fuente de prrafo predeter.RC@R Sangra de t. independiente `8@8 Texto nota pieCJaJ:&@: Ref. de nota al pieH*B+@"B Texto nota al finalCJaJ>*@1> Ref. de nota al finalH*2>@B2 Ttulo$dha$5\4U@Q4 Hipervnculo >*B*phVRbV Sangra 2 de t. independiente ^FV@qF Hipervnculo visitado >*B* ph4@4 Encabezado  !0)@0 Nmero de pginaO doctypeO date1"O" docnumber"O" docauthor: : Pie de pgina  !Ij%@S`3dgJ(= x Uj@;=3& >!#:###$$$%''''p(r())+,,@-B--0)11X2Z2%5'5)5+5-55t67)9V9999=::;;;;;<+<f<h<j<l<n<<<<<<<=E===?Y@ABEGGHHILLL#NNO@PPQ6RSTTVWDZZr[\q^_nddXeee!g#gJhxiN8m>9 E @ ?ROV?9m^ X!!""5##_$%%%&s&('u'([(()*9,s-.f001234R67L8899_::;3<<c=>>q?K@@[AABzCFDDxEFF]HH&IIJJSKK LLMNQ R~R:S$TUV:XXY/ZZJ[[\\]^_H``albcIddFeee01lmnA ?* %%%% )+F-03344A:=`B>EF HJJJJ:R;RgRhRViZ[^_ceh!j9l:lll(mrmmmmnnoqRrrrrrrrrs s s ssYttCvxwIxxyyzD{{|P}}~KȁJǂƃ]ɆZaJNJ$Dٍގxic @ؖj0~3 fD~qͦɧ]̪W#j>ٯn#|VfQ&h1^E/E:U )SwTQ000000000 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 0@0@0@0@0@0@0 0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 0 $=Pqy{Ґܛlٳ%|!ptuvxz|}Nuiɫ1Sqswy{~r !!t<ex?gXXw5::  @ -l$ae)LPVSZ?![(Yl $%#%&&%'{)))***+,6,,?-p-".a../00c0@333&4x4456O6;777FFG*HXHZHFJxJJMMMNNNPP Q QMQ~QRS7SSS!TBUrUUVVVWX7Xf\\\^^_/_{___`E`9agaabFbib cXcceXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX8@0(  B S  ?2 _Hlt25222946 _Hlt25222947 _Hlt25646940 _Hlt25646941 _Hlt25646953 _Hlt25646954 _Hlt25646955 _Hlt26961043 _Hlt25646969 _Hlt25647009 _Hlt25647010 _Hlt25648192 _Hlt25648193 _Hlt25648998 _Hlt25648999 _Hlt25649068 _Hlt25649069 _Hlt25649070 _Hlt25648261 _Hlt25648262 _Hlt25650801 _Hlt25650802 _Hlt25650622 _Hlt44247681 _Hlt44247682 _Hlt45274658 _Hlt45274659 _Hlt30942527 _Hlt30942528 _Hlt45292978 _Hlt25653902 _Hlt25653903 _Hlt25653904 _Hlt25653976 _Hlt25653977 _Hlt25654030 _Hlt25654031 _Hlt25654079 _Hlt25654080 _Hlt25654081 _Hlt25654104 _Hlt25654105 _Hlt25650330 _Hlt25650331 _Hlt43735668 _Hlt26961373 _Hlt25654145 _Hlt25654146 _Hlt25654147 _Hlt25654248ppJJJN1ϓϓ GGddde@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @@@@!@"@#@$@%@&@'@(@)@*@+@,@-@.@/@0@1@ppKKKO2ГГ !!HHffeeef\jst"8jjmmncoqofpprrrrs s ssstt't5t:t?tttttttttttcuiujuquuuuAvEvLvvvvvvFwwwwFxKxSx!y(yyyz#zzzU{\{{{{{{{_|b||||L}~~ nu8ʁҁہ69LRZ^ɂ͂#mpƆX\d·\a_Ɖe׍J܎*/>H (,e=CHLwejוBHlqۗ/15=NT:>?CDGx~BFGKLO ÞɞОBFLğƟɟ | &--5rosyդ$'K˦Ϧզ1ǧ˧ѧ٧7@٨[_ejqu}FʪYe %.ɬӬ߬>FGKLXlrv~٭ (7Bt|}!$@KR^cpïۯ OWX\p| %15AIP (\_bj~ղ۲8@fkڳIT"*38Givw{|AQ_o.>SZͷԷ и(48=Pbd39Qľ!)-#~"NZC-MHQCGN<Hq :QDuV[\jst"8F--_GtGUUVVCXUXYZ^"_``ddjjllmmnfpprrrrrrrrs s sHsNsssuAvvFwIwzwwwFxzzzC{|L}_aV8ʁILƂ(/ʄmpƆX·\a_Ae׍(J܎,eSWwƖږۗ/1[cОBɟ |-(5oBK˦Ϧ#1ǧ٨[FʪY">l@دۯm"eh%(dQQ4=nwCG-MCal!q +$:QUlDuRV33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333\jst"8--dd5e7ejj9l9lllmrrrs sCvvwwxwIxxyzzMzTzzzzzzzD{||||||||||L}P}~``wJJKǂ]_ȆX·\^`HIJJNJNJ$$>EFGًBC^efgoٍ4466@IJ܎( xxyeghii<<LLUUVVWXY`nvwWWcc((ӕӕ*@@ؖؖl/~~13 ffGGKL~OPɞɞʞϞОBğşɟɟ|&qf##11QRTTE->?ME""&./4U )uwJohn McMurtreyQC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of CAMSw 2ndrefs.asdJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docJohn McMurtreyHC:\WINDOWS\Application Data\Microsoft\Word\AutoRecovery save of CAMS.asdJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docJohn McMurtreyC:\My Documents\CAMS.docjallman>C:\Documents and Settings\jallman.HPI-DEVELOP\Desktop\CAMS.docJosep Planas Gamundi6C:\Mis documentos\Pep\Webs\procep\RemoteBehavioral.docRc?l+^`o(.  ^ `. L ^ `L.xx^x`.HH^H`.L^`L.^`.^`.L^`L.RcF        @d`@UnknownG:Times New Roman5Symbol3& :Arial"1hҜyҜydxFTZ.!0dn2QNIHJohn McMurtreyJosep Planas GamundiZOh+'0 $ @ L X dpxNIHIHJohn McMurtreyohnohnNormalMJosep Planas Gamundi92seMicrosoft Word 9.0i@G@z`@~@~TZZ՜.+,D՜.+,4 hp  selfw.n NIH Ttulo 8@ _PID_HLINKSAX8rb+http://www.mindspring.com/~silent/menu.htmG|mailto:Johnmcmurt@aol.com%<http://www.btinternet.com/~psycho_social/Vol3/JPSS-CS2.html1:#http://www.raven1.net/russtran.htm7fhttp://www.raven1.net/nsa1.gif6f'http://www.heart7.net/mcf/mckinney.htmy.=http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/classic_mind_control.html6`7http://www.webcom.com/~pinknoiz/coldwar/microwave.html1http://www.grn.es/electropolucio/munzert6902.docDL~2http://www.intec.rug.ac.be/ursi/Tor99ResolENG.htm {!http://www.raven1.net/1-02-6.htm x!http://www.raven1.net/1-02-5.htm/#u#http://www.raven1.net/govptron.htmrhttp://raven1.net/nature1.htmLo1http://www.isodarco.it/html/andalo03-wright.htmlyul4http://www.statewatch.org/news/2002/nov/torture.pdfi"http://www.raven1.net/europar.htm"cf(http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/9.htm"c#http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.html[E_.http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html[E].http://www.adacomp.net/~mcherney/aspects.html43Z:ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_ijcai.pdfqrW9ftp://ftp.idiap.ch/pub/reports/2003/millan_2003_nsre.pdf|6TChttp://www.idiap.ch/publications/millan-2003-comm-acm.bib.abs.html-(Q8http://www.datafilter.com/mc/machinesThatReadMinds.html%9N3http://www.his.sunderland.ac.uk/durhamab/ramin.dochjK0http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/15/8738Z]H1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/22/12953\^E1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/25/14658]ZB1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/26/15861]_?1http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/94/26/14965]O<0http://www.mod.uk/dlo/ipts/es_land/sta_spss.htmU{9"http://www.raven1.net/nij_p26.htm=60http://www.eecs.uic.edu/eecspeople/lin_acm3.htmNu31http://www.ojp.gov/nij/sciencetech/aca/07_01.pdfmi0+http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss/OCP/ocp15.pdfR -Ahttp://www.popsci.com/popsci/bown/article/0,16106,388134,00.htmlb*1http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/04_23_03.htmla|'1http://www.atcsd.com/PressReleases/06_30_03.htmlfh$4http://call.army.mil/products//thesaur/00016275.htm"!#http://www.pjproject.org/usaf.htmlg8?http://globalsecurity.org/org/news/2001/e20010327questions.htm-*#http://www.raven1.net/usafletr.jpg#>#http://www.raven1.net/v2s-kohn.htm4N=http://es.epa.gov/ncer_abstracts/sbir/other/monana/kohn.htmlke0http://www.delphion.com/details?pn=WO09310730A1=?#http://www.raven1.net/v2s-nasa.htm&w #http://www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm&+ http://www.raven1.net/frey.htm#,(http://www.datafilter.com/mc/jaski.htmlic?http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Campus/2289/webpage.htms9#http://www.dcn.davis.ca.us/~welsh/  !"#$%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F@~Data <1TableQWordDocument%SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8CompObjkObjectPool@~@~  FDocumento Microsoft Word MSWordDocWord.Document.89q